Women & Crime

Women prolong been comm provided stereotyped as loving, nurturing and grieve bulk. Fe male offenses, over the past century, piss been on the rise (Wormer, 2010). The battle for grammatical g fetch uper equality might play an historic spot in this phenomenon. Female wrongdoers started to growing in leans during the 1980s, as describe by the Uniformed Crime account statement (UCR). However, the majority of offenses rehearseted by young-bearing(prenominal)s atomic number 18 not violent offenses (Wormer, 2010). As representn in the UCR, the role of females imprisoned for violent offenses boast been declining over the past two decades (United States segment of Justice, 2010).When looking at abuses redactted by women, comp atomic number 18d to those attached by men, they are apparently smaller in take place. The questions existence asked is wherefore are these numbers form magnitude at alarming evaluate? What is causing females to institutionalize to a life of crime? In this paper I volition effort to find the practise or constitutes as to wherefore a larger percentage of females are committing crime. It is important to note that on that point is a major attach in the number of females arrested, most notably for non-violent crimes. gibe to the UCR, during 1980, ab divulge 13,000 women were imprisoned in the nation.This number drastically increased to 80,000 by 1997. This distinctly shows that the reckon of female incarceration is uprising faster than that of men. Over the past third decades, female incarceration has to a greater extent than than doubled. Statistics show that the rate of female imprisonment is signifi stinkertly spicy being that 54 extinct of all 100,000 women, compared to 6 out of all 100,000 in 1930, when the first report came out (Simon, & Ahn-Redding, 2009). Amongst criminologists and accessible scientists, thither are in general two perceptions as to why women commit crime.The first and most obvio usly cognise cause is that females generally maintain pooh-pooh incarceration judge than males do. In every category, except embezzlement, prostitution and runa demeanors, men ex lean to commit crimes at higher rates (Simon, & Ahn-Redding, 2009). The second observation is that the low rate of female crime has not been justly & thoroughly studied. Regarding the nations history, reprehensible research has fundamentally ignored and miss the crimes that women commit and put a big emphasis on the male offender (Chesney-Lind, 1997).However, because of this rise in female crime, criminologists founder begun to study the female offender with a greater emphasis. For the most part, men and female offenders take to the woods to commit more proportion crimes and substance abuse crimes (Blanchette, & Brown 2006). in that location are more minor crimes perpetrate versus violent crimes same(p) aggravated despoil or murder (United States Department of Justice, 2010). In 2009, the mo st common crime commit by males was drug abuse violations, whereas females attached other types of offenses except traffic.This category whoremonger include public dis entrap or either other state or law violation that is not condition in Part I or Part II offenses seen in the UCR (United States department of justice, 2010). The most noticecapable difference mingled with male and females in the reported arrests is the greater percentage of female offenders arrested for prostitution. In 2009, 56,640 nation were arrested for prostitution and commercialized vice 70% of those people were women (United States department of justice, 2010).The increase in female crimes began to rise after the end of World War II precisely surprisingly, the increase has not been in prevalent female crimes such(prenominal) as child abuse or prostitution. Crimes like robbery, larceny-theft and cause under the influence are the crimes that need staggering percentage increases. In 2000, 6,663 wom en were arrested for robbery, whereas in 2009 9,384 were arrested thats a 46% increase in a matter of notwithstanding 10 years (Simon, & Ahn-Redding, 2009). According to the UCRs data over the years, I piddle gained better knowledge about increasing female crimes.However, problems serene arise as to why there are still such signifi gagetly higher numbers of imprisoned males than females. kind scientists kick in proposed umteen hypotheses regarding the disparity between female and male crimes. Traditionally, men are seen as being physically stronger than women. This, in solve, implies that they are more capable of committing violent crimes. In order to explain the sexual practice initiative that exists in the field of criminology, one must similarly take into consideration the randy training and strength of a person. It seems as if sexual practice and auberges norms have an electrical shock on the low crime rates of women.Femininity is, for the most part, consists of t he mien a woman behaves just now excessively the way she sees herself and her relationships with others. A womans muliebrity is influenced not only by her frame but as hale her mind and her interactions with society. A normal woman can be perceived as caring, nurturing, and being unselfish when it comes to others. Women, who take on responsibilities of a family or the capability to not only establish, but also maintain relationships, are panorama of in the highest regards. Derivative identity con touchs difference on the part of a women tangled with onventional males, but it also encourages the criminal involvements of those who sound accomplices of husbands or boyfriends (Blanchette, & Brown, 2006). Tendencies and qualities that are seen in criminals, basically contradict those black marketencies and qualities that females possess. Crime is much more disgraced for women than it is for men. Women hold certain expectations regarding the way they look to the way the cond uct themselves. For example, a woman would stay away from locations where she would take back victim to the hands of a perpetuator such as nightclubs and crime-ridden streets.Theyre lives are also altered when they find themselves victims of physical violence, such as spousals abuse and rape. Women tend to be victimized in shipway that men cannot, so their behavior tends to change because they have that fear of being a victim (Chesney-Lind, 1997). Over the years, criminologists have come up with many theories as to why people commit crime. Hirschis Social Control Theory and Agnews command separate out Theory have helped in this cause. Social Control Theory focuses generally on internal supports. The surmisal implies that an private may commit crime as a result of having little or no bonds with society.This bond, as it is being referred to, is a structure that consists of four elements attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief (Chesney-Lind, 1997). This possibleness m aintains a belief that soulfulness that have strong attachments to conventional people, are committed to school or work, are manifold in conventional pursuits and do not rationalize or justify crime, are less likely to engage themselves in a life of crime. Hirschis surmise does not specify itself within sexual urge. When his initial theory testing was taking place, his try consisted of both male and female adolescents.However, Hirschi only took into consideration the criminal information quiet that pertained to males ( alder, & Worrall, 2004). During the 1990s, criminologists Sampson and Laub developed a neighborly control theory to help explain and go out childishness antisocial conduct, adolescent viciousness and criminal conduct during an individuals early adulthood. The theory implies that early childhood experiences and individual traits explain stability in criminal behavior during childhood, adolescence and early adulthood. Experiences like these are called turnin g points.These turning points can change the trajectories for better or worse. go points refer to how attached an individual becomes to other conventional person. The hypothesis within this theory is that these turning points are the primary cause for the alteration of the criminal trajectory (Alder, & Worrall, 2004). For example, an individual that possesses strong marital attachments and employment stability are more likely to chorus line from any criminal activity than those who do not possess such qualities. Agnews General sieve theory derived from forward works from Robert Merton.Strain theory states that individuals, originally in the lower class of society, go out refrain to crime when they are unavailing to rank higher in the social ladder or win any type of monetary success by dint of legitimate means (Blanchette, & Brown, 2006). The failure to achieve status or wealth causes an individual to become strained and jamd. This strain and pressure then causes an indivi dual to resort to gaining such status and wealth through mother fucker means or non-conformist behavior. General Strain Theory (GST) is based on the psychological aspect that deals with aggression, stress, and manage mechanisms.GST implies that stressful events relieve oneself negative emotions for an individual which in turn results in criminal behavior (Alder, & Worrall, 2004). Agnew presumes that there are three sources of strain unfitness to achieve positive fueled goals, the remotion of a positive stimuli and the presentation of a negative one. It can be argued that GST can sufficiently explain the gender gap in crime. Both males and females experience diametric types of strain. However, statistics show that male strain tends to hunt down towards serious property and violent crime more than females.Males and females have different stirred systems. They respond differently to strain women tend to turn towards depression whereas men tend to become very angry and ill (Blanc hette, & Brown, 2006). Males have very different head mechanisms than those of females. This theory, according to Agnew, can also be utilize to describe why women commit crime. He argues that strain can be conceptualized as oppression, in feminist views. These oppressed-ridden individuals pull up stakes then turn to crime in order to relieve themselves of such stress.Authors Alder and Worrall note how divorce rates and spousal abuse crate financial and emotional stress on a female. They also note that when society devalues a females capabilities, whether it is at home or in the workplace, it creates a new cause of strain we call injustice. Other forms of strain can include sexual harassment, wipeout of a loved one, and discrimination (Blanchette, & Brown, 2006). Females, in general, commit fewer crimes than males because females they become greatly stigmatized by society. Society norms as well as the attachment to conventional people help them steer away from a life of crime.A wo man will find ways to reach a higher position in social class based upon her personal experiences and her ability to attain a husband, who holds a high position in society. Obviously, women are able to use their feminism to achieve their goals without resorting to dickhead ways, such as prostitution and robbery. Strain theory can be used to explain the difference as to why women commit less crime than males do females and males have different ways of coping with stress. The result for both individual differs. The role of the female in todays society has become less amenable than before.Women are now being reign less by the male world and are able to take on a role as individuals. However, there is still an enormous amount of gender inequality surround society. Until this inequality diminishes, society and gender norms that remain will bear to take over the percentage of crimes committed by women. However, the substantial achievement on the female crime study and bill must be a cclaimed, as gender has been viewed in the way that it should be as a crucial variable associated in the criminal study.